It is fairly easy for us to learn about the history of the
Wicca and contemporary Paganism in the United
Kingdom and the United States through books and
scholarly articles originally published in those countries. It requires a bit
more digging to discover the history in Canada. Only one book,
Witches
and Pagans and Magic in the New Age, written by a non-Pagan journalist
(Kevin Marron) really exists; and it is out of print. This article, the second in a series that traces some of the roots of Wicca in
Canada, was originally published in the magazine WynterGreene in 2008. It relies primarily on interviews and newspaper
clippings.
The first part of this article looked at some of the early figures of Wicca in Canada.
This second segment looks at Wicca in the Canadian courts and public opinion.
Part II – Rights
Marie
Joséphine Corriveau. In
1763 she was the first woman to be tried and
found guilty of Witchcraft in
Canada
by the military courts after
New France fell
to the British. She was suspected of at least one other murder, before being
convicted for the death of her husband. After her execution her body was left
to rot in a cage at the crossroads to the city. It is believed that her trial
was as much political as it was about
la sorcellerie. This was not the
only witchcraft conviction in early
Canada, but it is believed to be
the first.
But Wicca is not the witchcraft of
La Nouvelle France.
When Wicca started to arrive and be openly practiced in
Canada in the
1960s through to the early 1980s, there was very little distinction between the
different kinds of Wicca. Craft was simply Craft. Initiates recognised each
other through shared ritual ‘markers,’ and it was not uncommon for an
Alexandrian, Gardnerian or other High Priest or Priestess to borrow a partner
to perform ritual or initiations if no one else was available. Wicca was also
much less distinguished from Satanism and other form of witchcraft that it is
these days. This is quite evident from a couple of highly publicised court
cases of the time.
Perhaps the best-known court case is the libel charge that
Lion-Serpent Sun brought against David Maines and the evangelical television
program
100 Huntley Street
in 1988. Four years earlier, the show had aired an interview in which
Pentecostal minister Len Olson told the tale of how he found Jesus: He claimed
that in 1972, Mark Fedoruk (now Lion-Serpent Sun) had tried to kill him and his
wife during a satanic ritual in
Victoria,
BC. Sun sued. His version of
events was that in 1972 he was practicing Wicca, not Satanism, and that on the
night in question Olson had smoked a significant amount of pot following a
ritual and simply had a ‘bad trip.’
The case offered Canadians a fascinating, if somewhat
slanted, look into the beliefs and practices of witchcraft in BC in
1972, as
well as at the time of the trial.
Among the evidence presented was Sun’s own
Book of Shadows. As well, during the testimony of Gary Gage-Cole, a coven-mate of
Sun’s, a photograph of the ritual room on the night in question was brought
into evidence. The room had a pentacle with symbols around it painted onto the
floor. During his testimony, Cole explained that the symbols in the darker
shaded ring between the inner and outer circles were Hebrew letters that stand
for names of God, but also are symbols of fire, water, wind and earth. He also
said that some of the symbols were for angels and bats, or devils. “It's a
balance, or a blending of opposites. As with everything in life, there is a
duality,” he testified.
Several prominent BC witches also testified at the case,
including Jean Kozocari and Robin Skelton, a professor of English at the
University of Victoria.
Skelton was the first witness
in the trial to refuse to take his court oath on a bible, suggesting it would
be inappropriate. After 15 hours of deliberation over two days, the jury
decided that Sun did not attempt a human sacrifice, but that it was also
substantially true that Sun was a Satanist. With their verdict, hey awarded Sun
$10,000 in damages, plus court costs to be paid by the
100 Huntley Street. The verdict
was both a victory and defeat for Sun, who said after the trial, “I do resent
being called a Satanist in the sense that it's been explained in so many ways
as being such a negative thing. […] I find that difficult.'' Later, a judge
over-ruled the jury’s awarding of damages and ordered that since there was
“divided success” on the allegations of libel, that the costs be split between
to two parties. This was a decision that ultimately left Sun out-of-pocket
financially.
Elsewhere in
Canada,
courts were busy trying to decide if Wicca was a religion. In
1986 Charles
Arnold, with the support of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, filed a
grievance against the Ontario Labour Relations Board. Active in the Wiccan
Chuch of Canada, and an initiate of several traditions,
Arnold
was employed as a secretary at
Humber College in
Toronto.
In April 1986 he put in a request to take Beltaine off work as a paid religious
holiday. The request was denied on the grounds that Wicca was merely an excuse
for “frivolous and morally-questionable acts.” The case went to arbitration in
1987 and
Arnold
won his case. In its ruling,
the court stated that “Wicca is obviously a
religion,” and in so doing set the first tangible precedent of a government
body in
Canada
recognising Wicca as a legitimate religion.
A similar challenge in
Calgary
in
1992 involving visiting rights in a custody battle also put Wicca on the centre
pedestal. In a court hearing,
George Gay was denied visiting rights with his
son because he was “involved in black magic”. In his appeal, Gay admitted to
practicing Wicca, which he described as a religion involving worship of nature
and pagan deities. Testifying on behalf of the defence, Rev. Paul W. Newman of
the
Toronto
office of the United Church of Canada's Division of World Outreach, said in a
letter of support, "I wish to testify the Wiccan religion is an authentic,
respectable religion that works for the health and well-being of its
followers." Gay won the appeal his visitation rights were restored. In
their ruling,
the Alberta Supreme Court said that religion could not be
considered a factor in deciding custody of a child. This ruling is one of many
that solidifies that ultimately it is behaviour rather than belief that is
important to the Canadian courts.
1
A couple of years later in BC, Wicca was once again publicly
challenged. In
1994,
Sam Wagar had won the nomination as the provincial New Democratic
Party candidate for Abbotsford, in BC’s ‘bible belt.’ His nomination was later
challenged on the basis that he was a witch and that he failed to declare this
during the nomination process. Wagar had been quite visible as a public witch
for over 15 years and felt that his religion was irrelevant to the nomination.
He agreed to a second nomination race, but lost. Wagar
filed a human rights
complaint against the BC NDP on the grounds of religious discrimination. The
case was settled out of court. It also appears to be last time that Wicca has
been publicly challenged I the court or in the media.
While some Wiccans and witches were busy defending their
rights and freedoms in the courts, other individuals were using the power of
networking and the written word to take a more pro-active approach to securing
acceptance for their religion.
Not long after the Lion-Serpent Sun and Charles Arnold
trials, the
The Law Enforcement Guide to Wicca by Canadian Wiccan
policeman,
Kerr Cuhulain was published in 1989. This book was “an important
Canadian first step towards normalising relationships between Pagans and the
police,” according to Professor Lucie Dufresne of the
University of Ottawa.
It has also become a classic text and widely distributed around the world in
many languages. Cuhulain also founded the Wiccan Information Network (WIN) in
1989 to help counter the negative public perception of witchcraft, after having
become involved a few years’ earlier with the Witches’ League for Public
Awareness. It is believed that he is the first police officer to come out of
the broom closet.
In
1994 the
Pagan Federation Paienne Canada was founded as a multitraditional
organization to “protect and promote the reputation of Pagans and Paganism in
Canada.” It
later incorporated in 1997 as federal nonprofit organization. Over the years
the PFPC has provided Federal and Provincial governments with an understanding
of contemporary Pagan religions, and been instrumental in getting Wicca and
other Pagan paths included in the
Canadian Military Chaplaincy handbook, as
well as initiating
chaplaincy programs in a variety prisons and hospitals. They
have also been advocating for a repeal of the witchcraft law, which still
exists in the Criminal Code of Canada (section 365).
These cases, as well as the efforts of many others too
numerous to mention in this brief article, have opened the doors to the
acceptance of Wicca as an almost mainstream religion in
Canada. Wicca
is currently one of the religions listed in the Canadian Military Chaplaincy
Handbook, and indeed, earlier this year a
Canadian military chaplain gave
permission for a Wiccan Ostara celebration to be held outside the Christian
Fellowship Centre at the NATO base in Kandahar,
Afghanistan.
One Canadian and six American Wiccans participated. Wiccan clergy have been
allowed to visit Canadian prisons since 1981 to offer pastoral care to inmates,
and several Wiccan or Neo-Pagan temples in BC have managed to meet the
requirements for religious establishments, complete with ‘marrying rights;’
although attempts in other provinces have met with much less success.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I am also enormously grateful to
everyone who took the time to answer my questions and share their stories. I am
especially indebted to Castalia, Hawk, Richard James, Shelley Rabinovitch, and
Sam Wagar for their help with this article series. These articles would not
have been possible without their patience and time spent with me in person or
online, or the valuable resources and contacts they provided.
Endnotes:
1. In Canada, religion is a freedom and cannot be
contested in court. However, religion cannot be an excuse for behaviour that is
excessive, dangerous or contrary to Canadian laws. (Lucie DuFresne. Lecture on
Religious Rights in Canada,
Gaia Gathering, 2007.)
No comments:
Post a Comment